What the county record says
| Address | 5839 Emerington Cres, Orlando, FL 32819 |
|---|---|
| Parcel ID | 212328000000004 |
| Subdivision | Not a plat — metes-and-bounds description (see below) |
| Water and frontage | Lake Chase — lakefront |
| County just value | $2,924,790 |
| Living area | 6,932 sq ft |
| Bedrooms | 4 |
| Bathrooms | 6.5 |
| Year built | 2014 |
| Just value per sq ft | $422 |
Reading the numbers
Six and a half baths across four bedrooms. Two and a half baths beyond the bedroom count on 6,932 sq ft — 1,733 sq ft of house per bedroom, the widest bed-to-area ratio on the crescent and among the widest anywhere in this pass. Whatever the plan is, it is not organised around bedroom count.
$422 a foot is mid-band on Emerington Cres, identical to 5739. The two are 155 sq ft apart in floor and $64,120 apart in value despite being built six years apart and sitting at opposite ends of the crescent.
Built 2014, between the crescent's 2007–2011 first phase and its 2017–2021 second.
Reading the legal description — and the parcel ID
This is the one parcel on the crescent whose subdivision field is not a plat name. Every other address here reads “Emerson Pointe”. This one reads as a metes-and-bounds commencement clause — “Comm at NE Cor 21-23-28, th N 8…” — truncated in the roll at thirty characters, describing a starting point and a bearing rather than a lot and block.
That is a meaningful difference for anyone checking lot lines, setbacks or what the property actually includes. A plat gives you a recorded lot with dimensions on file; a metes-and-bounds description gives you a survey call that has to be run. The postal address does not signal which one applies, and neither does the neighbouring parcel's.
The parcel ID is also unlike its neighbours. The eight other parcels on this crescent carry structured IDs in the 2123282463000xx series; this one is 212328000000004, with the section-block segment zeroed out. That looks like a placeholder or a manually keyed record rather than a normally generated parcel number, and it should be verified against the appraiser's own lookup before it is relied on anywhere.
Neither of these makes the record wrong. Both mean the tax roll cannot answer a lot-line question here on its own, and this page does not pretend otherwise.
Reading the frontage
Lakefront is a mapped-polygon flag against Lake Chase: the parcel reaches the water at 986 metres from the mapped shoreline reference point. No shoreline length, dock, seawall or lift is recorded against it.
Because the legal description is metes-and-bounds rather than a recorded lot, the frontage flag carries more weight than usual on this parcel. It is the only filed statement this record makes about the water.
What this page is not
- It is not a listing. Nothing here says the property is for sale.
- It is not an appraisal. Just value is the county's assessment figure for its own tax year.
- It does not confirm a dock, a seawall or navigable access to Lake Chase.
- It does not confirm lot lines or setbacks. This parcel is described by metes and bounds, not by a recorded lot.
- It does not verify the parcel number. The ID format differs from every other parcel on the street.
Check the copy against the record
Paste your listing description and get a free grade across five categories, plus a rewrite that stays inside what the record supports.